JFK - BOM in 28 hours
That's right. A trip that should take around 14 hours doubled into 28. Here's the story.
Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com
That's right. A trip that should take around 14 hours doubled into 28. Here's the story.
The Bio-Disc is really, quite a stupendous product.
Comments [1]
Hey, what? I love digital photography. Sadly sometimes I wish it wasn't invented (I'd be happy with just film if digital never came along).
Reason : Facebook photos.
Never before have people felt the need to document every single moment of their pointless lives with overexposed compositionless flashfull photographs. I bet you at any gathering of two or more people who have Facebook accounts, 512MB (or more if the person in question spent money on a camera they have no idea how to use, except for...) of the world's data will fall into oblivion with the amount of rubbish pictures they'll start snapping away.
With each person having their dedicated 'Facebook Face' (girls, I know you practice it in front of the mirror, daily), pictures go on and on. The typical 'oh look, our hands!' picture and others of the sort.
You know I wouldn't mind it if you took a few photos. Thats alright. Hey, photographs are a good thing. But when you organize events and gatherings with a firm purpose to create Facebook photos, sorry, go away.
And people, lets leave the real photography to photographers. We don't need to see your schmancy mirror poses (ugh) and your -oh-my-good-god-sepia! processing.
New phenomenon by the way, Photo Booth. Not only is it sad that now people are buying Macs because they're 'cool' (instead of buying a Mac because its a Mac), the only application they seem to make due use of is photo booth. I mean, people spend days in front of it, posing with their friends, using those ghastly effects, and all for... Facebook.
Why the need to take all these photos though? To show off? My my thats childish. I agree sometimes the photos make sense, moments and all that, but not 221 of the same people in different poses (is it your solution to backing up photos?). Is it peer pressure? Because everyone else takes these photos you must to? Your photo count is too low? I'm not really sure.
Before Facebook, you could turn a corner without having to stare at a giggly-girls-group photo shoot. Why didn't you all take pictures back then, before Facebook? Oh right, because back then it wouldn't increase your Facebook photo count, isn't that right? Sure, you'd still take pictures, but you wouldn't drain your camera battery doing so.
Meeting friends is becoming an event for more Facebook pictures rather than actually meeting them. Half the time, or more, will be spent taking pictures. Events will have that recurring pause for Facebook pictures. Everyone will line up to be shot (sigh, its a camera and not a rifle) and the flash fires and whoopee, lets do 78 more, 76 of which will look exactly the same.
I could really go on about this forever, instead, I'll classify these twerps by their photo count (these are general guidelines so as always there are exceptions):
Comments [2]
We all know about rickrolling. Its been pretty much impossible to avoid (have you managed to avoid it?). Its getting old (really really slowly though, as slow as LOLcats)
Comments [1]
In all probability, I'm the only person in New York state with the last name 'Chougle'. Well, at least the only one with significant (legal?) presence here.
It says there are approximately two persons with the last name Chougle. Probably because I've entered the country twice? Or, it does say approximately, so its probably wrong. But if there's more than one, I'd like the meet the other Chougle.
Well its probably untrue but a fun thought (and coincidence) anyways.
Comments [1]
Comments [0]