Fruggums

thoughts and thinkings by azhar chougle 
Filed under

rant

 

JFK - BOM in 28 hours

That's right. A trip that should take around 14 hours doubled into 28. Here's the story.

Snowstorm is about to hit NYC so I get out early to the airport. Reach at around 2, check-in, security and hanging about by 3. Flight departs at 6.

We're all on the plane and JFK starts getting raped by snow. It takes two hours to get the plane moving and then de-iced. So we leave by around 8PM. Around half an hour after we leave, JFK shuts down.

Delay : 2 hours

All goes well and we reach Brussels an hour late but that's alright since I still have an hour to catch my flight to Bombay. So we get into the holding pattern over Brussels with visibility at nil. Captain Oliver informs us that we can do this for two hours if we have to. An hour later, Brussels shuts down. 

Delay : 3 hours

So we head over to the alternate airport 10 minutes away.

Liege.

I know you have no idea where that is. Well, a bit southwest of Brussels, Liege would be the transit point between Earth and Eternal Doom.

There's pretty much nothing at Liege airport. Four tortured souls comprise the ground staff and the only excitement around is the large TNT logistics hub. Mainly a freight airport, the place didn't even have facilities to offload luggage. Belgian authorities didn't want us to get off the plane anyways (not even the Belgian citizens, some of whom lived 30 mins away). So there we were, stuck in Liege, sitting on the plane waiting for Brussels to open up again.

2 hours later, Liege shuts down.

So now with both Liege and Brussels closed, the situation becomes pretty aggravating. Note that throughout all this there's a baby crying a row ahead of me. It wouldn't stop throughout the entire flight/ordeal. 

Adding to Liege's reputation of 'Gateway to Hell', it has no food. The pilot was gracious enough to procure something from somewhere (apparently a catering company). What it ended up being was a bun (a third the size of a normal bun) with a slice of ham (the 'non-vegetarian' option) or cheese (the 'vegetarian' option). I wish I had taken a photo of this thing. It was so small you could drop it in the aisle and you'd need a torch to find it. That's what they managed to organize after four and a half hours of sitting on the apron in Liege.

2 hours later (now we've been here for more than 6 hours, still in the plane), the new captain (Captain Oliver exceeded the maximum permissible flying hours for his day) announced Brussels was open. Hey, this is great news! We should be out of here in minutes! The plane was de-iced and then we waited to get going.

But no.

Being Liege, gateway to hell, they didn't have a pushback truck with the adapter to attach to an Airbus (hell has obviously been privatized by an American company). So they had to send for one from god-knows-where.

Well it did finally arrive eventually. Our new douchebag captain didn't realize that the plane would ice up again and he had to begin de-icing all over again after we did push back. This was to be expected.

So we flew the 10 minutes back to Brussels. It was a beautiful 10 minutes though. Rural Belgium, covered in snow, at an orange sunset, and we were hardly a few thousand feet up thanks to our bus-ride-like-trip.

Delay : 10 hours 

So we arrive at Brussels and are instructed to go to B40 to figure out the situation. The flight to Bombay left hours ago, so they had no option but to send us to -

Chennai. Jet Airways being the only airline flying to India out of Brussels.

Of course this flight departed an hour late too. Passing over the Arabian Sea we flew right past Bombay and into Chennai. The next connecting flight to Bombay was around two hours later by the time us JFK people got our bags (absolutely last, of course).

Delay : 11 hours 

And then the flight to Chennai, two hours later. We had to pass through customs and immigration at Chennai before heading to the domestic terminal. At which point we weren't allowed in because we didn't have tickets. The Jet Airways staff was of course, ill-prepared and as confused as a Beanie cap with opposite pole magnets in each rotor. After finally getting in by harassing some trying-to-be-courteous asshole staff guy we get onto this all-economy 737 and begin the one and a half hour flight to Bombay. Half an hour late, of course.

Delay : 13 hours

(License for this image : Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commerical Share-Alike)

Flying into Bombay was a treat actually. We flew right over the tip of Bombay (the docks, Gateway of India, all that) and then circled round into the airport. 

Then finally, landed in Bombay, got the bags, hopped into a cab, bought a bottle of Bisleri en route, and headed home. 

Arrived 14 hours after my scheduled arrival. 

Now most of this was due to weather in Belgium, agreed. But Jet Airways had a big part to play in this mess as well. Picking an alternate airport which is completely unprepared to handle a diverted flight (in terms of equipment on the ground and basic things such as food) was just stupid. That was the main cause for much of the suffering. During the rest of it they managed alright though.

Anyways, good to be home. 

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   funny   india   mumbai   nyc   random   rant   travel  

Comments [0]

$15 and a Year of Jail

"The United States incarcerates more people than any other country in the world - by far" (here's an excellent read about that). Today I got a first hand experience of that.

No, I'm not blogging from jail (though I would throw a pretty sick 'Free Az All' campaign online if I was)

A month ago I ordered a roundtrip to Jamaica station for a trip to Canada. Its cheaper and it means I don't have to wait in a line with luggage. Tickets arrive in 1-3 business days, usually.

So when they didn't show up for a month I called to ask them to refund me. I thought this would be straightforward but it isn't. Now, things get lost in the mail. Its impossible for every single envelope to be delivered successfully given the volume of mail USPS handles and the sometimes ragged appearance of the people walking around with the mail. So mine was one of those unlucky ones. Ok, they can grasp that concept, even though this a government company.

They send tickets in unmarked non-privacy (which means you can hold it against the light and see its a ticket in there) plain white envelope. 

A few days later I get a form. The usual regrettance-inconvenience schmitz part and then a form I have to send back. It just scared the wits out of me.

Essentially its a legal document that makes me swear that they're actually lost in the mail and I didn't get them. If I'm lying here, I'm lying to the government. There's a lot of the word 'perjury' sprinkled all over this thing. Swearing is alright, I guess. Its the penalties that really got me.

If it turns out, if the ticket that I don't have i.e. somebody else might, gets used, they can prosecute me and fine me $1000 and... send me to prison for a year.

A year.

That's a ridiculous penalty for cheating a railroad company out of $15. For one if the postman who nicked my ticket decided to use it, there's no way to track the person who actually used the ticket, all that's known is that someone used it, someone lied about getting it, someone needs to go to court.

Suppose these ridiculous threats are just deterrents? Well then, to the person who actually had their tickets lost in the mail and signs this thing for a refund, good guts you got there. I'd never sign this thing. Even if one would never end up being convinced and given a sentence, having to land up in court for such a thing is maddening in itself. They can keep their schmeasly $15.

Think about the loss they were to make if indeed someone did cheat them using this system (whichever mad person it would be). They're hauling an extra 60-100kg (on average) for a few miles. Trains can do that pretty ok without posing much of a severe threat to their operation or others' safety. This unlike people with knives and guns walking around who are the people who happen to go to prison too, like this man who cheated the government out of $15 (which isn't enough for more than a day's living in Manhattan)

Just another one of the tales that makes this country so fascinating to study. 

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   articles   nyc   random   rant   travel  

Comments [1]

Apples

It was somewhere in 2003 that I was asked by my Mom's friend to rip a couple hundred CDs to her laptop so she could put it on her iPod. Being completely business-minded since a young age I charged her per CD (at the time this was a skill not many kids my age had). I didn't know what an iPod was. Heck, nobody new. I hardly even knew Apple even did anything other than that Mac thing that so totally failed - and anyone who bought one was an idiot.

So there I was with this PC laptop and a boxed third generation iPod and a big stack of CDs to get onto it. As I un-boxed the iPod, you can't imagine the sort of immense 'wow' you get out of it. They don't package iPods like that anymore. It came in a medium-sized cube which folded out, and one was greeted with the 'Designed by Apple in California' on opening it. The type on the box was glossy silver. It came with a Firewire and USB cable, along with a dock, pouch, case and cloth.

I didn't know how to use it. It only took a few minutes to figure the thing out. The backlight to the four top buttons was red. I liked that. The hold key got me confused for a second (why isn't this darn thing working?!) but then you just click it back to white and it lights up on its own. You scroll around, you punch in the center. Hey these headphones came with it... hey this sounds pretty good! Oh shit this thing lasts 8 hours?! How many GB did you say? I don't even have that much music.... Oh wow the metal back is so shiny... and there's a silver Apple etched right in the middle of it... they muse use lasers to do that...

... Holy expletive who came up with this.

So I spent a few days transferring the music onto it and careful sneaking in a couple hours of listening time in between study breaks. Eventually, since it wasn't mine, I had to let it go but the fascination continued and I found myself on Apple.com a few times a week just reading about what they were up to with all this.

I don't remember how long it was till Mom gifted me one of these. 20 gigabytes. Carry all your music in your pocket. Before this I used to listen to music on my phone or carry around a little pocket radio (those were so popular, and when they started making them look like iPods you knew radio is dying). I was addicted to it. A little treasure. Always carried in the case. No keys in that pocket, ever.

Having an iPod in 2003 was very different from having an iPod in 2009 (wow, six years huh). I'm not talking about it being a status symbol. It wasn't just that. Sure, you had to be quite fortunate to have one, but there was more to it. iPods weren't popular at all. Especially in India. Not many people even knew what Apple was all about (me included). So this exciting new device came fresh without any background and could just stun people. If you had an iPod then, you were unique (and again, not only because your parents could afford it). There was something about it that said you knew what good design was all about. It was almost as if you knew Apple was going to take over the world at that point. And you had the first bits of it. The iPod wasn't a trend, it wasn't cool necessarily, it was what is was because of design and function. No other player could carry as much music. No other player was as thin, sleek and well thought out in doing so. As simple as that.

So there was something special in being part of the Apple culture at the time. Was it because it was so small? That's one of the reasons. Another reason is you had to be smart to have one. This is a time when (in my surrounding humanity) the knowledge on how to properly copy a CD wasn't very widespread (this also because most people didn't have CD burners). Sure the thing came with a manual, and everything you needed - but you just had to be a geek of sorts to really use it (this is how we started - with me getting the work of somebody who didn't have a clue about using it). You had to know how to obtain music (P2P was still quite new back then and CDs were expensive) then get it on the thing and then keep it there while knowing how to avoid breaking this delicate glossy godly creation. Not everyone knew it back then, and at age 13 in 2003. You were, essentially, part of the technological elite. And that was something. To this day I consider the 3rd gen iPod the best design Apple has produced for its iPod line.

Today's iPod has retained nothing of the sort. Now, I'm not saying this in a bad way. If iPods didn't become popular, Apple wouldn't have rejuvenated Mac - and the iPhone simply wouldn't exist today. So it was definitely a great thing to happen to the company. But along with this came popularity. Mass popularity. It wasn't because suddenly everyone knew how to use iPods i.e. they became geeky enough to evolve into the culture, its simply because the average-everyday-daily-Joe-Windows2000user people started buying it, and rattled their way around and somehow got it to work. Then it became cool. Then everyone had one. So it became a necessity. A requirement. Not a choice, a requirement (and how and why is another long story).

You know what was the requirement in 2003? Windows XP.

Funny, isn't it.

So Apple has become immensely popular, people flock to the 'Mac Store' (ugh, idiots), buy up their shiny new gear and profess their genius for choosing 'an Apple'. Why did they choose it? Heck they aren't entirely sure themselves. But they knew that they couldn't go PC. Isn't current requirement.

Then Apple started catering to the mass market. Oh yes, this is optional extra. So is this. Hey, new iPod! Hey look guys, time to upgrade your Macs to this one! Yeah isn't Steve Jobs your childhood hero?

And then every time Apple releases something new the whole world goes 'Oh my... honey, get the car' and dashes off to stand in line so they can get one on the very first day, use it to a quarter of its potential, and repeat the process within the very same year. Apple is my life!

Well, I'm portraying Apple as quite evil here. Far from. They still do make better computers than any other company. A better phone. Best portable music device. The people who deny it are doing it because - Apple consumers are now either a) Normal people who bought a Mac because they're ignorant or b) The ultimate fanboys. Neither of the groups give the culture a very good standing.

You know when I used to drool over new products Apple came out with? When I was sure the entire world wasn't behind me willing to stamp me down to get to it first. Now, I'm content with my Mac (and will be for years), don't plan on replacing my iPod for a long, long time (or my iPhone) and the new releases of iMacs yesterday just flew right by me.

Its impossible to get small-company Apple back. When they were generous enough to present us with the full package rather than have us buy additional bits which should've been in the box. What I'd like to see is companies bringing back that innovative charm to technology that won't have the masses swooning - because they won't understand it. Just like the first iPod.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   articles   geek   ideas   iphone   rant   tech  

Comments [2]

Modern Criticism

Artists have to deal with it day in and day out. Well, not really 'deal' with it, but require it. Sift through a splurge of reactions to find that one person who appears to make a little bit of sense.

For some reason we require a form of validation that what we're working on happens to be acceptable (or even better, appreciable) to someone other than oneself. Here's the cool part, most of the artists we recognize today didn't need that (Robert Frank being my favorite example). They just went along and worked on what they had to. 

When we ask someone for criticism we're putting them in a position of power. They are suddenly put on the pedestal and given the right to form a (hopefully unbiased) opinion on what they think about something. Part of the problem is, when someone is asked to be a critic, some people are put in this subconscious mindset that whatever they come up with has to be criticism. This is where most of the praise just withers away. To be given the title/power of 'critic' means that you obviously are regarded highly for your opinion by that person. Hence he/she expects something unique, useful and honest from you. Which means the 'critic' here, to keep up his/her won status, is going to consciously search for negatives to either balance out the positives or negate them altogether. Otherwise, what's a critic?

When I'm working on something I'm always asking people what they think. I listen to all of it. I accept around 13-17% of it. I act on about 1% of it. There are very few useful critics around. There may be several hundred good ones, but they probably aren't of much use. A large lot of people are unaware that this applies to most if not all artists and isn't just me being a narcissistic dick. For one its impossible to act on 99% of critical suggestions because 1) It doesn't fit with what the artist wants to convey and 2) Another critic already conflicted with your recommended course of action. 

So really what criticism is is a little fun game we artists play. We skip along asking what you think and throw it out until we reach somebody who can actually help more than just critique. We're a confused lot. Half the time we don't know what our own vision is and sometimes we rely on other people to figure it out and scratch at it. Sometimes we just need a nudge in another direction to get things going again. And sometimes playing the criticism game is the only way to get it.

By now most of you who have ever offered me advice or opinions are probably thinking 'Hey, WTF - well, this guy doesn't need to know what I think anymore' and its probably true (even though I'll still ask you and continue to play the game). Look at that sentence again, it centers around you, not me. Those are the sort of people who are out throwing opinions (and will do so when asked) at people for their own mood. I'd like the opinions that are centered around me, because it's my work and not yours - and if you treat it the other way around anything you have to say will be useless.

And that's modern criticism. And y'know what? Guilty as charged.

P.s. It goes without saying how much worse the people who can't be honest are. Even if your opinion could turn out useless don't hide it. Lying and saying you love it is worse than saying you hate it but you're not sure why.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   art   articles   photography   random   rant  

Comments [1]

The Corporation

This is a movie you really should watch. There's a lot to be said about the topic, but instead of me ranting about it just sign up for a Netflix trial and get it.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   ideas   movies   random   rant  

Comments [0]

Fwd:

Since the time Hotmail became popular, people have been sending along chain mails, some of which remain in circulation to this day.
 
I guess at that time email was so new and fascinating that it didn't come into practical use until a year or so later, until everyone had an email address and large corporations began to formally incorporate it. So until that happened it was pretty much used for chain mails and later, spam.
 
Today - email is a primary form of communication of course. So chain mails today, are - spam.
 
Some of them can be funny, some interesting, maybe witty, inspiring, whatever (most of the time it's rubbish though) - but I don't want them in my inbox. I love email and get a lot of it during busy times so I don't like these things coming along interrupting it all.
 
So I politely ask the person to stop sending them to me. Of course sometimes I get a negative reaction which can't be helped. Forwards are almost a passive way of keeping in touch really (which is never a bad thing) - but there are better ways to go about it. The best one being Twitter of course, but explaining Twitter to people can be painful.
 
The forwards I do accept : the personal ones. The ones that come only to me, because it means that the other person knows that *I* will find it interesting (instead of taking a chafe and sending it off to the entire address book).
 
And even better - Delicious. A fantastic underutilized way of sharing that hasn't penetrated enough to make it more network-oriented and social rather than personal bookmarking.
 
So don't be offended if I respond with a 'Stop, please' to a forward. No offence, really.
 
Composed entirely on an iPhone, so ignore spelling errors.
 
Azhar Chougle | via iPhone

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   internet   rant  

Comments [0]

The Amateur Photographer

I've been meaning to write this post for a while, especially since my position on it has changed in the past couple of months.

 As an amateur soon (hopefully) turned professional photographer, I deal with and observe several amateur photographers on a daily basis.

 Obviously there's a difference between a person such as me who is pursuing photography as art and career and a person for whom photography never extends beyond a hobby. There are also a certain group of people stuck in between - the 'serious' amateurs, to whom I'll devote a special paragraph later on.

 How do I feel about amateur photographers? I'm quite neutral towards them actually, and probably will be going forward. There are things I love, and things I despise about them.

 Realize two things here 1) I was once an amateur photographer, each professional at sometime was and 2) Amateur photography today has been shaped almost completely by the advent of affordable digital photography.

 Here are the things I like about having this class of people around. For one, they give my corporations a great deal of funding to keep developing their professional line. Sony is the best example here. Without their compact camera division flourishing, their advent into the professional market would have been all the more risky. Amateurs are easily conned into spending large chunks of money (XYZ Megapixels!) which means that large corporations don't have to pay much attention to the technical aspect as much as the 'cosmetic' hype (hello Nikon D5000). More of that money can go towards their pro line.

 Here are the things I dislike about amateur photographers (honestly, most of these didn't apply to people like me during my first year, but some did, which I've expanded upon). For one they buy multi-thousand dollar DSLRs they use on Auto. It's frustrating to me when someone goes ahead and buys a camera worth that much money and end up not knowing a thing about it. Even worse, some assume that they have professional cameras and then compare it to mine, which is a modest setup, but that's the thing - they will never realize that you don't need to spend thousands of dollars to get great photos. It helps, when you know how to use it, but if you don't, it's just technical jargon that you can rant about not knowing what it all means.

 Next, some amateurs can be a bit stubborn at times. I can't blame them for this one though, its perfectly normal. When they get a "great shot" by their standards they get so pumped up and excited about it to the extent that they can compare it to a professional's work (yes, it happens). They aren't very down to earth sometimes. But you can't blame them here, they aren't exposed to great photography in the first place. A large part of them follow the misconception that photography is about the camera, and I'm no greater than them unless I have a better camera. Looking at my work, the first question is usually "What camera do you use?" Guess what, both my cameras are out of production, but I'm extremely happy with them and I can still make great pictures with them. Realizing that it takes the skill of a photographer and not the circuitry of a mass-produced digicam to accomplish a great photograph is a hurdle nearly every amateur (who dares proceed further than amateur) has to overcome.

 This one applies to me too - amateurs think film is dated, old and nothing compared to modern day digital. Like most amateurs today, I started out with digital, so I thought the same "Why would anyone use film?" Right? Well, wrong. Film has dynamic range and resolution that hasn't been achieved in the digital world as of yet is your straight and honest answer. And well, it is a lot more rewarding, fun and skillful but that's another story. Also, amateurs, please - just because one is a photographer does not mean we know every single model and make of camera out there - we know what we work with and that's it, Google a review for yourself, but if you need assistance comparing cameras with tech specs or image quality examples, we'd be glad to help, just don't rattle off DSC-PZ10 and expect us to know anything, it isn't our realm.

 Right, the 'serious' amateur. They form a minority of the amateur spectrum. And I'm glad most of the amateurs I interact with fall into this class. They are the ones who have an honest love for photography. They're down to earth people who pursue it as a passion only because their day job happens to be something a bit less adventurous (they might say otherwise, and they're right sometimes). They know their cameras and value them well. They don't make art, but they can make some damn fine pictures nevertheless. Always out to learn, very few amateurs progress to this stage, and these are the people who could turn professional if they push themselves hard enough.

 So as I said - I'm neutral. Photographers wouldn't be anything without amateurs, because that's where everyone has to start, there's no trickery to evading this stage. It's just that with digital photography, everyone thinks they are a photographer now (and some of them are, and move forward) - people seem to be pushing it a bit too far sometimes.

 End of thesis.

 Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   art   articles   photography   rant  

Comments [3]

Busy

Usually one would think that my busiest times of the year is when I'm at college.
Strangely enough I end up far more active when I'm not enrolled in an education system.
 
Possibly because during college, my personal endeavors take a back-seat because of assignments, papers, printing and all that. My personal work is far more time-intensive than college work.
 
At the moment, other than preparing for my transcontinental migration (which is work enough), most of my day is spent intensively studying Ruby, as I'm trying to teach myself Ruby on Rails this summer. Then there's also SSH. I also updated my photography portfolio site, have to do a re-design of my blog, and search for photographers to assist in the summer (much harder than you think). So I end up working pretty much the whole day.
 
Which is why this blog post is so short.
 
Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   random   rant  

Comments [2]

Iron Maiden : Flight 666

Today I went to see Iron Maiden's movie - Flight 666.

I'm assuming you know who they are and what they're all about. 

This was easily one of the highlights of my semester. It's difficult to type it all about, put it into words - because you'd never feel the way I did unless you were there. No amount of wordplay is going to get you to live that experience. But this isn't about you for now, I'm writing this because I really can't keep it all in, mainly because I don't know any heavy metal fans I can spill this out to (the one I do know sleeps at 10PM and isn't an Iron Maiden fan, sigh)

I was at the first show of the Somewhere Back in Time World Tour in Mumbai. Hovering around the 10th row in an absolutely sold out show of 30,000 fans crammed into a dusty smoky sweaty mess.

This was no ordinary movie. Outside the theatre, the place was dotted with Iron Maiden shirts, one guy even had a Powerslave Mask on. Once you get in, you realize that not many people are outside because well, there's already a line 40 minutes before the show. This is a movie theater, not a concert. There was 'MAIDEN MAIDEN MAIDEN!' chanting already. Theater supervisor tried to calm us down because there were other movies going on. Hah, well, he tried. It's just such a fabulously crazy group of people to be among. To anyone that thinks heavy metal fans are a bunch of rowdy a**holes, you've got it all wrong - that's all I'm going to say, because if you had that preconception, you won't believe me till you see if for yourself. Alright, and then this flood of Maiden shirt sprints into the theatre. I got a center seat so I was pretty stoked about it all. 

The movie opened with footage from the Mumbai show. During the show, you're in some other place (No, I don't drink) and really, it's the most surreal experience you can have, I hardly remember most of it - you're there, just there, going completely nuts the entire experience, arms in the air, shouting your lungs out. You don't feel much of it till it's over. To see footage of the show, to think that "Hey, I was in there" was ... heartwarming, spectacular and mind-blowing. To see what they saw, what that show was, was emotional. To be able to say - I was there, right there, is something special. 

The show was loud. I mean - LOUD. As loud as a concert. That was brilliant. To feel the concert as if you're there. Nothing compared to a plasma and a home theater. Mind-rattling bass and you can hear the crowd just enveloping you. There's really nothing like it, except, being there in real life. Even better, the entire theater was singing along with every song. To the point where we hand our hands up clapping along with Bruce - "Screeeeeam for me Mumbai!" - I still remember that one. I lost most of my voice for the rest of that night.

You might not understand all this if you aren't into heavy metal music. I'd be happy to help you out on that front. 

Iron Maiden manages to do something no other band has managed to do for me. When I was at the concert, when I was at the movie, when I'm listening to them at home, things change. All the rubbish I have to put up with sometimes just doesn't matter at all. Everything to worry about, think about, all those problems, downfalls, irritants, and anything that just keeps you from being plan and simple happy and alive,  just - gone. That's something that I tend to need quite often. And in the movie you can see how much this band means to people. No other band bothers to go to places like Colombia and Costa Rica and travel so extensively covering the entire globe to make sure they don't leave anybody out. Getting to people whose only route to Maiden is old casette tapes. There was this one scene - right after the concert, for about a minute they showed a man who managed to get hold of one of Nicko's drumsticks just crying and crying for that entire few minutes. You feel it right there. It just means so much to people. Not many bands come to India either. No band like Maiden has ever come to India. And to see these guys just giving people that experience is just, there are no words for it. And really, they're a swell bunch of guys, if you watch the movie you will realize how amazingly down to earth they are, it's unbelievable. I can't wait to get my hands on the DVD and re-live the entire thing best I can. My neighbors aren't going to like me very much that day.

I could go on, and on, and on. I just needed to vent here. If you're an Iron Maiden fan, you probably didn't need to read this. If you aren't a fan, you're probably wondering why you wasted a few minutes bothering to go through this - or, you're thinking - I want all of this right here. Go get it, you won't ever regret it.  

Up the Irons,

UP THE IRONS!

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   concert   movies   music   rant  

Comments [2]

Target Audience

As a photographer, I have two target audiences. 

It gets irritating sometimes.

There are the 'normal' people. They don't get art. They won't try. That won't change. They'll go by looks. Depth and meaning, not required. They look for an impressive visual. So this would probably be the photo they're most attracted to. Or something similar. And that's alright.

There are the artists. My professors, classmates and anyone who knows art. Looks can't cut it here. There has to be depth below that surface. Hey, it has to be aesthetically working, but that alone can't make art sometimes. Innovation thought and meaning. So this would probably be my most successful artwork.

The hardest part - to cater to both. The two audiences are so frustratingly incompatible most of the time that essentially I have two different portfolios, and each audience will probably never see the other one.

The saddest part - I find the 'normal' stuff fun, yet pathetically easy sometimes. Its so easy to produce pretty photos. And it can get boring. It isn't challenging. Sure I'll fall for it once in a while but art is always aiming higher (suggesting that the artistically inclined audience is a 'higher' audience, are they?).

There are times when things mix. And mix well. These rare occasions are the special ones. And its happening more often as time goes by. When portfolios dare to merge just a little bit. Audiences have an equal reaction (negative, or positive). Maybe that's a photographer's goal? To get to the point where you can produce work that would appeal to nearly anyone. Artist or not. 

I don't know. Lets see.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   art   photography   rant  

Comments [0]