Fruggums

thoughts and thinkings by azhar chougle 
Filed under

geek

 

Apples

It was somewhere in 2003 that I was asked by my Mom's friend to rip a couple hundred CDs to her laptop so she could put it on her iPod. Being completely business-minded since a young age I charged her per CD (at the time this was a skill not many kids my age had). I didn't know what an iPod was. Heck, nobody new. I hardly even knew Apple even did anything other than that Mac thing that so totally failed - and anyone who bought one was an idiot.

So there I was with this PC laptop and a boxed third generation iPod and a big stack of CDs to get onto it. As I un-boxed the iPod, you can't imagine the sort of immense 'wow' you get out of it. They don't package iPods like that anymore. It came in a medium-sized cube which folded out, and one was greeted with the 'Designed by Apple in California' on opening it. The type on the box was glossy silver. It came with a Firewire and USB cable, along with a dock, pouch, case and cloth.

I didn't know how to use it. It only took a few minutes to figure the thing out. The backlight to the four top buttons was red. I liked that. The hold key got me confused for a second (why isn't this darn thing working?!) but then you just click it back to white and it lights up on its own. You scroll around, you punch in the center. Hey these headphones came with it... hey this sounds pretty good! Oh shit this thing lasts 8 hours?! How many GB did you say? I don't even have that much music.... Oh wow the metal back is so shiny... and there's a silver Apple etched right in the middle of it... they muse use lasers to do that...

... Holy expletive who came up with this.

So I spent a few days transferring the music onto it and careful sneaking in a couple hours of listening time in between study breaks. Eventually, since it wasn't mine, I had to let it go but the fascination continued and I found myself on Apple.com a few times a week just reading about what they were up to with all this.

I don't remember how long it was till Mom gifted me one of these. 20 gigabytes. Carry all your music in your pocket. Before this I used to listen to music on my phone or carry around a little pocket radio (those were so popular, and when they started making them look like iPods you knew radio is dying). I was addicted to it. A little treasure. Always carried in the case. No keys in that pocket, ever.

Having an iPod in 2003 was very different from having an iPod in 2009 (wow, six years huh). I'm not talking about it being a status symbol. It wasn't just that. Sure, you had to be quite fortunate to have one, but there was more to it. iPods weren't popular at all. Especially in India. Not many people even knew what Apple was all about (me included). So this exciting new device came fresh without any background and could just stun people. If you had an iPod then, you were unique (and again, not only because your parents could afford it). There was something about it that said you knew what good design was all about. It was almost as if you knew Apple was going to take over the world at that point. And you had the first bits of it. The iPod wasn't a trend, it wasn't cool necessarily, it was what is was because of design and function. No other player could carry as much music. No other player was as thin, sleek and well thought out in doing so. As simple as that.

So there was something special in being part of the Apple culture at the time. Was it because it was so small? That's one of the reasons. Another reason is you had to be smart to have one. This is a time when (in my surrounding humanity) the knowledge on how to properly copy a CD wasn't very widespread (this also because most people didn't have CD burners). Sure the thing came with a manual, and everything you needed - but you just had to be a geek of sorts to really use it (this is how we started - with me getting the work of somebody who didn't have a clue about using it). You had to know how to obtain music (P2P was still quite new back then and CDs were expensive) then get it on the thing and then keep it there while knowing how to avoid breaking this delicate glossy godly creation. Not everyone knew it back then, and at age 13 in 2003. You were, essentially, part of the technological elite. And that was something. To this day I consider the 3rd gen iPod the best design Apple has produced for its iPod line.

Today's iPod has retained nothing of the sort. Now, I'm not saying this in a bad way. If iPods didn't become popular, Apple wouldn't have rejuvenated Mac - and the iPhone simply wouldn't exist today. So it was definitely a great thing to happen to the company. But along with this came popularity. Mass popularity. It wasn't because suddenly everyone knew how to use iPods i.e. they became geeky enough to evolve into the culture, its simply because the average-everyday-daily-Joe-Windows2000user people started buying it, and rattled their way around and somehow got it to work. Then it became cool. Then everyone had one. So it became a necessity. A requirement. Not a choice, a requirement (and how and why is another long story).

You know what was the requirement in 2003? Windows XP.

Funny, isn't it.

So Apple has become immensely popular, people flock to the 'Mac Store' (ugh, idiots), buy up their shiny new gear and profess their genius for choosing 'an Apple'. Why did they choose it? Heck they aren't entirely sure themselves. But they knew that they couldn't go PC. Isn't current requirement.

Then Apple started catering to the mass market. Oh yes, this is optional extra. So is this. Hey, new iPod! Hey look guys, time to upgrade your Macs to this one! Yeah isn't Steve Jobs your childhood hero?

And then every time Apple releases something new the whole world goes 'Oh my... honey, get the car' and dashes off to stand in line so they can get one on the very first day, use it to a quarter of its potential, and repeat the process within the very same year. Apple is my life!

Well, I'm portraying Apple as quite evil here. Far from. They still do make better computers than any other company. A better phone. Best portable music device. The people who deny it are doing it because - Apple consumers are now either a) Normal people who bought a Mac because they're ignorant or b) The ultimate fanboys. Neither of the groups give the culture a very good standing.

You know when I used to drool over new products Apple came out with? When I was sure the entire world wasn't behind me willing to stamp me down to get to it first. Now, I'm content with my Mac (and will be for years), don't plan on replacing my iPod for a long, long time (or my iPhone) and the new releases of iMacs yesterday just flew right by me.

Its impossible to get small-company Apple back. When they were generous enough to present us with the full package rather than have us buy additional bits which should've been in the box. What I'd like to see is companies bringing back that innovative charm to technology that won't have the masses swooning - because they won't understand it. Just like the first iPod.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   articles   geek   ideas   iphone   rant   tech  

Comments [2]

Twitter isn't Mainstream

Of course, not too long ago, there was a point where e-mail wasn't mainstream. But, most people (if not all) who discovered e-mail, tagged along and told everyone else about it. E-mail is pretty simple. Type it out, pick who it goes to, done. 


When you think about it, we've come a long way from e-mail. Most notably of course - instant messaging, which also is mainstream - essentially it's e-mail, just, instant. There's not much to it, so people got hooked?Hear me out, I'm going somewhere with this.

Then came Twitter.

Twitter isn't mainstream (yet?).
Sure, every other person now knows what it's about, but they aren't on it, because they can't be.
Why? It isn't - Type it out, pick who it goes to, done, like every other form of personal internet/mobile/physical communication out there.

It's far more open, complex and marvelous than that. Some people find it scary, others pointless. They just don't get it. Just recently I'm seeing people who criticized me for joining Twitter ("Twitter is so stupid... you're stupid") joining themselves (you know who you are). As expected, they couldn't grasp what all the fuss is about and left. Some of them didn't even get to their first tweet. 

Twitter is for a different kind of person - this isn't followed by a 'for now?' because it always will be in my opinion. You don't have to be a geek to treasure everything that is Twitter. But you can't be the sort of person who owns a MacBook purely for Photo Booth (if you know what I mean). Twitter works best if you're an internet-person. Your natural tendencies are to blog - you connect, you explore. You do something more than just log into Facebook and start up that MSN Messenger thing and nudge the brains out of people (ew). 

Twitter isn't straightforward - you need to learn how to use it. What @replies are, how to send a DM, what's-this-search-thing, the clients, the apps and all that shazzaz. Some people just won't make the effort, give up and scaddadle, and those are the ones who will end up coming back again when Twitter goes mainstream. Right now we're at the "Hey, what's this Twitter thing everyone is talking about" stage. If Twitter goes mainstream, people will be forced to join just because, well, everyone else already has. Which is quite a sad affair but unfortunately true. But this is only if Twitter does go mainstream. 

It's quite a strange scenario when you think about it. Maybe something like this will happen. Assume there are 100 number of Facebook users joining twitter each second. 30 of them won't get to the first tweet. Another 40 will leave after a week. 20 more after a month. 10 of them will stay on and do themselves a favor by figuring it out and joining the community. When this 10% grows to 10% (or even 5%) of the overall Facebook population, there'll be this landslide of people just falling into Twitter. That doesn't mean they're going to stay for long, but - Well, it's just a theory.

Personally, I love the fact Twitter isn't for everyone. The twitterati seems to simply be a great crowd at the moment. It doesn't have a pool of those damn YouTube commenters and Facebook "I'm bored..." -ers to send people into incessant facepalming. Don't get me wrong, I'm not being selfish ("No Twitter for you!"). Anyone is welcome, and obviously I have no way to stop you or anyone from joining. Just don't come along, join, leave and then shout out "Twitter is pointless." just because you don't get it. 

Random thoughts, random thoughts.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   articles   geek   internet  

Comments [0]

Software Discoveries

Macs have such a plethora of software available for them that it really is hard to find all of the good stuff sometimes. You don't know you need it till you have it. Being the geek I am I troll around looking for programs that just make my life (not only computing life) so much more simpler. I'm mentioning my recent discoveries :

DeliciousSafari

Finally, a great way to post to Delicious in Safari. Similar to Safari140 for Twitter. If you're a Delicious lover like I am, this is for you, hands down the best way to interface with Delicious on a Mac.

Cover Stream

iTunes interfacer thingummy. The usual scrobbling, remote support, searching, all that good stuff. Worth checking out, but CoverSutra is my pick.

ScrobblePod

If you are spiteful at the fact your Last.fm play count would be double what it is if you could scrobble your iPod and your iPhone. The Last.fm client is much bulkier than this. Also provides a nice interface to Last.fm to tag and love tracks quickly.

SofaControl

Control most of your Mac via your Apple Remote. 

And my favorite discovery today...

WriteRoom

Simulates a Typewriter on your Mac. Eliminates all distractions so I can write that paper in peace. Clean mission, achieves it well. 

I can't possibly write about or tweet all my discoveries (but I do sometimes). If you want to keep track of it, I bookmark them, so here's a direct RSS feed (this feed has Mac software discoveries only, not all my bookmarking activities, for that - use this one). Friend me on Delicious too.


Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   geek  

Comments [0]

Etymotic Research

I had to send my ER-4P (according to me, nothing beats it, and I'm not the only one who says that, Google a few reviews) headphones in for repairs a week ago to Etymotic Research. You know what a Head-Fi I am. Kind of a painful experience to go without them for a while.


But they came back today. And this post is just to say what a bloody awesome company Etymotic Research is. After they received my headphones, they inspected them thoroughly. Every single aspect of it. And they were as thorough with repairs. My cable suffered a shallow cut after a mishap with scissors in the darkroom last semester. Sound wasn't affected at all - the ER-4Ps cable is tough and rugged. So a bit of tape and it was fine. I was experiencing some intermittent in the right channel, but wasn't sure if this was in any way related to the cable cut. 

Just to be sure, I contacted Etymotic. Their customer support is simply fantastic. You're talking to a real person, who knows what he/she is talking about every time. Each response is detailed and hand-typed (not copy-pasted from a set of answers). They read and understand what's wrong. Hardly any companies bother to do this anymore. Their phone support - there's no "Dial 1 for...", instead, someone jolly picks up the phone and is ready to help you out straight away. Really, this is what support should be.

So I decided to fork over the $50 to repair the cable. Because I don't want it breaking apart when I'm in India. 

But these guys go beyond the call of duty. Nobody says they have to inspect it. But they did. They found the cause of the channel fading (it wasn't the cable). More so, they found that both the pod stems were cracked (you have to know the ER-4P to know what those are). This is a common issue and happens due to the way the headphones are designed. 

This is where they stunned me though. The pair was just barely out of its warranty period. They replaced the cable and transducers for free. Then changed my filters, replaced the eartips and shipped it back by UPS so it got here in two days. Didn't ask for a cent. Essentially, I have brand new headphones. 

Being the loyal customer I am I have offered to pay them for it (well the cable at least) but I don't think they'll take it. Just trying to be fair and honest, I don't want to cheat them out of a charge. They would have asked for payment before shipping it if they wanted it. Or they really trust their customers (though they haven't asked me to send anything on the invoice either).

This is why I have such insane brand loyalty towards these people. 

Etymotic Research, I love you.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   geek   music  

Comments [0]

Last I liked

I've been on Last.fm and iLike but of course it makes sense to only be on one of them. I noticed that the Last.fm community is far more intelligent/diverse/musical.

   
Click here to download:
Last_I_liked_tag_internet_geek.zip (197 KB)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   geek   internet   music   random  

Comments [2]

Flux and Dropbox

I've returned to two pieces of software I thought I'd share, because one requires some convincing for people to hop on.


This would be f.lux ; right from the page :

Ever notice how people texting at night have that eerie blue glow?

Or wake up ready to write down the Next Great Idea, and get blinded by your computer screen?

During the day, computer screens look good—they're designed to look like the sun. But, at 9PM, 10PM, or 3AM, you probably shouldn't be looking at the sun.

F.lux fixes this: it makes the color of your computer's display adapt to the time of day, warm at night and like sunlight during the day.

It's even possible that you're staying up too late because of your computer. You could use f.lux because it makes you sleep better, or you could just use it just because it makes your computer look better.

Let me tell you it works. Being someone who spends too much time in front of screens (from iPhone to iPod to Mac) - the difference after just an hour of usage was noticeable. I think it also helped me sleep better (the last two days I've used it). I spend less time staring at the ceiling it seems (this is different from having an outrageous sleep pattern mind you). Eye strain reduced too. And for color sensitive work (photography, you know) you can temporarily disable it.

So try it out, see if it works for you.

The second one I came back to was dropbox

I'm a storage geek, so trust me on this one. I have my personal drop.io and box.net premium accounts and I use them quite regularly (intensively when I do) but it always bugged me to have to open up Safari to upload. Dropbox is drag-drop-forget, once you put it in there, its gone, and when I head down to the labs I know it is, just log on, it will zip it up and there's the download. Its worth having it running in the background just for this convenience.

Dropbox shines when you have multiple computers. Which I don't, but you might.

So, just some random things. A lot of things are happening. And I'm quite the busy fellow. And these are two of the things helping me chug along sanely.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com




Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   geek   storage   tech  

Comments [0]

Facebook

Let me take the liberty to create a stereotype out of the average (by average, I mean 300+ tagged photos, wall postings of 'hi, wts up! hvnt spken to u in ages!' and bumper stickers and what not) Facebook user when it comes to design trends.
 
As expected Facebook revamped their home page design, and tweaked individual profiles. As a person who knows that there exists an internet outside of Facebook (ZOMG, REALLY?), and happen to use other websites (and not Googling 'Facebook login') I welcomed the changes thoroughly, everything became cleaner, usability shot way up. Much less noise than the old one.
 
But of course, as with any design change, Facebook users revolted, suicided and all that tosh.
 
Why?
 
Well, not only because they don't have much design sense. There's more to it, and believe it or not they're right, in a way. Facebook addicts are on the site so much, constantly, that any interface change sends them flying. Their (now innate) muscle memory on where everything is and how to get there goes for a toss. Some go into anaphylactic shock, even.

Furthermore, as the users adapt (I mean physically, finger length/strength ratio and such, developed for P&S camera shutter release optimal speed) to the new changes, they'll end up loving it as much as before. Do you really think, I mean seriously, is anyone going to leave Facebook because they changed the design? And it isn't like they made everything pink or disabled the ever-so-grossly popular <3 symbol. Of course not. So quit whining retards.

 
So even though these design changes are for the better, any design change Facebook will ever make will send these people off bridges. This is where Facebook is guilty - releasing a somewhat complete revamp in one fell swoop can cause these people a bit of pain and sorrow. Gradual changes should be employed instead, and maybe these people would pay a bit more attention to their lives instead.
 
Twitter addicts, on the other hand... next time, next time.
 
Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   design   geek   rant  

Comments [1]

Qables!

After my intensive reading of Head-Fi, I realized that regarding my current rig, there is one major flaw - source.
 
Taking output from the headphone jack of an iPod is actually quite an 'average' source. Its nothing special and because the sound is going through all those el-cheapo components right out of the DAC (Digital to Analog converter), quality suffers.
 
So I realized that I needed to get a Line Out Cable.
 
What this cable does is let me get pure line-out audio from an iPod. It bypasses the tiny mediocre amp and circuitry leading to the headphone port and gives me unaltered pure analog signals straight from the source.
 
So I went out, did my research, and settled on a Qables Performance Line cable (Other great makers are ALO Audio and Moon Audio. There are a lot of people who make their own. The most expensive cables cost around $300 or more). Here's my mini-review.
 
After listening to just a few songs (without burning-in the cable) - the difference is bloody obvious, and I only expect it to get better as proceed to burning it in.
 
From the iPod (ALAC), to the Qable, to a Headroom AirHead, to the ER-4Ps, let me tell you, it sounds miles better.
 
I don't even have to delve into specifics, the overall sound itself is far richer, crisper, warmer, cleaner. The most pronounced improvement is in the mids - they seem to pop a lot more than before. The bass is much more well-rounded and a wee bit stronger (appearance of even lower frequencies). Taking the boom of a bass drum as an example, instead of being a single sound occurrence, like a little singular pop, it has a beginning fade-in, the pop, and an end fade-out - there's a little more resonance and impact. Overall, the sound feels a lot more balanced, everything seems to blend together in harmony (warmer) - I especially love this because the ER-4Ps tend to lean toward the clinical/cold side sometimes. The soundstage is also extended by a bit, but this one took a bit of time to realize. Really, it is a very large difference from the headphone port.
 
Overall, an LOC (especially a quality one) is a fantastic investment. Don't worry Mom, I paid for it myself.

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   geek   music   tech  

Comments [2]

I'ma gona crazee!

Today I spent most of my day (wait... all of my day) reading Head-Fi. (Sparked my my post yesterday and the fact one of my friends is buying new headphones.)


So I literally have been reading the stuff there all day. 

And you guessed it, I'm gonna list my dream setup (it isn't exactly a dream list actually, this is a list judging by what I currently know about high-end audio, better stuff exists, but I'm staying conservative so that all of this stays within my knowledge, and my potential price range)
Now many would say that I'm an idiot/crazy/stupid/materialistic/etc fellow for continuously making so many lists of things and skills I'll be acquiring over the next few years. But the thing is, you will never get something if you don't (really) want it first. Many a good things have resulted from setting future goals (not only material, but for example, I never would have learnt web design if it didn't start out with a post like this) Of course this will only actually happen a few years into the future, but thats fine. It isn't as if I'm saving up now or asking someone else to buy it for me. And I hope this post could serve purpose beyond being a dream list, maybe as a recommendation to anyone out there who is looking for an audiophile headphone setup, this would be my current recommendation (the least researched part is the Amps/DAC, Headroom is a brand I trust, but you do get some amps that get raved about much more unfortunately)

So anyways, here it is : 


AKG K-702 with ALO SXC Cable
$549

(Edit : I think I'd either go with the default cable for a while or maybe even go for the K701s on this one, it would save a couple of hundred and allow me to go for better interconnects)

Definitely the AKG K701 - $250

HeadRoom Micro Amp and Micro DAC - $600
(Power is a problem though, if I ever switch between countries, the voltage changes, irritating)

(Edit : Might prefer a Pico Portable w/DAC : $499 - not sure though, HeadRoom are great, I had to send my amp to them from India for repairs, as it was under warranty it was done for free, and they FedEx-ed it back, Mike was a fantastic fellow during the whole thing ; the Pico only has USB too, while HeadRoom DAC's have optical and USB along with the usual line in)

Thats it actually. Of course, there are interconnects, that would be around $100 $50, since I would take a Toslink out of the MBP (actually I was torn between optical out and a digital Firewire out, I'm not sure which is better yet) to the DAC and then a standard line (but not a cheap one) from the DAC to the Amp. Oh, and an ALO cable from my iPod ($200) (with an iMod - $250 - but this is pushing it, realistically speaking, I'm fine with just a Qable (Yes, Qable, not cable - Google) line out and don't need the iPod extras).

Yeah, I've gone crazy. Judge me.
Photography dream list, coming soon (yeah career must come first, so before I blow off an assumed $700 on my personal satisfaction I'd rather save it for half a lens for that food and shelter hype going around)

(Edit : I've edited this post at least 8 10 times since I posted it as I continue to obsessively expand my knowledge)

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com




Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   articles   geek   music   rant   tech  

Comments [0]

Audiophiliaco!

Anybody who knows me beyond a How Are You knows I'm a total audiophile (not a hardcore guy who knows every single thing there is to know, just someone who truly appreciates and longs for great sound). And while I may not fork up the cash for dreamy audio equipment, I try my best to squeeze the most out of what I can afford (and I'm not complaining, I've been privileged with some quality sound and am thankful for every moment of it)


I'm a strong advocate of Etymotic Research's headphones. If you like true, accurate (did I mention brilliant?) sound, these are the guys you can trust. I own the ER-4Ps (I didn't pay $300 though, I'm a deal-hunter). I could write a long five page review easily but many people already have, just do some Googling

I also own a HeadRoom Total AirHead (these guys are awesome too ; I got mine used from Ebay) portable amp that gives the Etys that extra kick and creating the all important brain-encompassing sound stage in your head (did I mention I'm also an Eneloop fanatic?)

I live for Lossless audio and try to get my hands on as much as I can (which means I buy CDs, sometimes). Weapon of choice is an iPod Classic 160GB to fit it all in a pocket (or two, because of the amp).

Speakers of choice are the Harmon Kardon Soundsticks II and there's a pair of B&O BeoLab 4000's at home (though I don't like B&O as a company, they aren't worth it in my opinion, other manufacturers make cheaper speakers that sound far better, but may not look as good).

For some reason I don't like Sennheiser. I'm not sure why, I just don't like them. Their low-end stuff sounds crude, and I haven't heard enough of their high-end stuff to know how they stand there, but for some reason I dislike companies that tend to have a wide array of low-end products in a field where excellence is something attained not so easily. Its a silly reason and I'm sure I'm wrong about it (so don't flame me) but it has been a gut feeling for a while. Or it could just be the people buying low-end headphones from them and then saying "Wow, these sound great!" when its far from so. I don't know (I tend to have odd brand loyalty situations such as these)

Unfortunately there are too many things where money is required. Looming college tuitions, plane tickets, and the basic (unfortunately essential) things like food. But I have been saving up for a pair of AKG K 701's for a while (and probably will be for a few more years unless I sell a few prints or get a sudden inflow of cash ; thankfully I have a steady flow from the advertisers on my blog, but hosting expenses tend to take a toll on that) and hope to have a shot at getting a pair someday. But again, that money can (definitely) be put to better use, so I'll be torn with the decision for a while and probably end up buying something more practical... food, maybe, but probably something photography related, because, well, career comes first. Unfortunately photography things are too expensive to dream of saving for right now, and its no point buying anything unless you buy the best, which can last you a few years into your career at the minimum. The poor man can only afford the best heh?

Oh, and I'd just like to dispel a rumor about IEMs/canalphones. 
Most people think they are harmful for your hearing. Not true. From Head-Fi :

"EM is often mistaken as a kind of health hazard which responsible for hearing loss and ear infection. The fact is, IEM is very safe when properly used. 

First, you need to understand that listening music at loud volume over time can damage your hearing, regardless of what kind of headphone (or speaker) you used. The advantage of using an IEM is that you can turn your volume down since you do not need excess volume to overcome ambient noise. The lower volume used in IEM means IEM is actually much safer than using earbuds or headphones in a noisy environment. Do not think that IEM will cause damage to your hearing as it is closer to your eardrum. As long as the volume is low, IEM is just as safe as any headphone on the same volume (scientific references 12)"

Happy listening. 

http://www.last.fm/user/azharc

Azhar Chougle | www.azharc.com




Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   articles   geek   music   tech  

Comments [0]